3D/HD TV : when the abstract becomes reality !
lima-city → Forum → Sonstiges → English
after
all
almost
film
filmen
first
format
front
futur
his
http
investment
kind
lot
monitor
most
not
see
these
url
-
A Step Towards Future: is the new 3D just an other gimmick or an evolutionary step in our entertainement ?,
I am sure that no one can deny the great success of the excellent movie “Avatar”: the James Cameron’s 3D blockbuster, now the highest grossing movie of all time, has fueled the growing frenzy for 3D TV. and mainly because of this movie, recently there has been a lot of hype regarding the new HD/3D TVs now available at most electronics stores in many countries around the world, this 3D movie that embraces the spectator/user with bright and vibrant 3D quality imagery,
while still in its infancy, the 3D TV is still a few years away from having everything fall into place, but with experience, and great directors like James Cameron and big entertainement companies like 20th Century Fox, and many investments i predict the HD/3D to be the next big thing in ‘must have’ technology. Aside from the Apple iPad of course.
but when we ask anybody right now: Are you considering buying a 3D/HD TV?, probably he will answer's that these Tv's are very expensive. but What would be your answer ?
-
Diskutiere mit und stelle Fragen: Jetzt kostenlos anmelden!
lima-city: Gratis werbefreier Webspace für deine eigene Homepage
-
Ok, first you have to ask yourself, what is the benefit of such a TV? You can view a few films, which are especially produced for it. And that's it...
Perhaps if most of the content on tv were in 3D, it could become interesting - nontheless there are the inconvenient shutter glasses. You have to put them on each time you want to watch things in 3d.
Until there is a technology where you can watch with your bare eyes in almost any angle in front of the tv and most tv stations are providing content for it, it will never be more than an expensive toy.
Just look at the nvidia technology for shutter glasses, it is working great with nearly any 3d game but only few people use it. ( Link ) -
taboreasrecken schrieb:
Ok, first you have to ask yourself, what is the benefit of such a TV? You can view a few films, which are especially produced for it. And that's it...
Perhaps if most of the content on tv were in 3D, it could become interesting - nontheless there are the inconvenient shutter glasses. You have to put them on each time you want to watch things in 3d.
Until there is a technology where you can watch with your bare eyes in almost any angle in front of the tv and most tv stations are providing content for it, it will never be more than an expensive toy.
Just look at the nvidia technology for shutter glasses, it is working great with nearly any 3d game but only few people use it. ( Link )
Yes the inconvenient of such TV, that the 3D films and products are too rare, and too much expensive, but like i said this is a new experience and a new way of entertainment, and every technology begins with a small step then the better comes after a while, in the futur, i am sure that the shutter glasses will be not necessary to watch a 3D film or to play a 3D game. -
The 3D technology is not so new anymore - it exists since decades... I remember films I've seen in 3D on my usual old tube TV with paper 3D glasses, almost 10 years ago. The only thing that changed is the quality and the shape of the pictures taken. Interestingly now a war has begun about which 3D glasses-technology is the best - there seem to be a difference between the formats of the glasses (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/28/technology/28glasses.html?_r=2&ref=technology)...
-
Yeah of course the 3D is an old idea, and many companies has attempted to launch this technology, but now i guess all TVs companies focus their efforts in 3D technology, and movies like "AVATAR" gives them the incentive to invest in this technology. but i hope that the glasses will be not necessary in the futur to watch 3D films or to play a 3D games or any 3D stuffs in the futur.
-
starlines2 schrieb:
I don't think it will soon be possible to watch 3D films without glasses, because the glasses are needed to "cheat" the brain - it has something to do with the functionality of the 3D technology. To get the 3D effect you need to have two different pictures on the screen, which you have to get together before they get to your eyes - and this is what the glasses do. So they have to invent a completely different 3D technology if they want to do this without glasses, and as far as I know we are miles away from such a technology...
[...] but i hope that the glasses will be not necessary in the futur to watch 3D films or to play a 3D games or any 3D stuffs in the futur.
-
I mean 3D / Animations!!
Besides, there is a new technique, to autopsy someone without cutting the dead body, just with help of 3D Monitor.
They use the nuclear spin tomography, to "scan" the body. And then they don't need to cut anything. Its easier to find little peaces of bullets all that kind of things.
Its in beta-use but they helped a lot in some criminal-cases.
I think its evolutionary step for sure.
and I like anthony hopkins, one day he will be dead. I mean he is an old man, but thanks to 3D they can make films after a stars death, of course he and his family should think clearly about that.
Beitrag zuletzt geändert: 23.4.2010 20:31:54 von mirov -
Diskutiere mit und stelle Fragen: Jetzt kostenlos anmelden!
lima-city: Gratis werbefreier Webspace für deine eigene Homepage
